"the whistle of the lash and its loud flat-sounding impact on the flesh. The boy's body quivered; but he made no sound, he walked on at the same slow steady pace. The coyote struck again; and at every blow at first a gasp, and then a deep groan went up from the crowd." (115)
Sensory language does not show up often in this novel, probably in accordance with the London tone. When describing a place frowning upon individuality and creativity, using imagery becomes ineffective. Huxley describes London as those living in London would describe it. He does so efficiently, commenting on productivity and ways to increase productivity. If he were to describe this unemotional place using imagery, London would seem more warm and open, as opposed to cold and cut off. However, Huxley introduces imagery when describing the cultural elements of Malpais in order to create warmth. This lends contrast between the two obviously different cultures. In describing this scene in such detail, Huxley adds to the atrocity by enveloping the reading in to the scene and the culture.
"Sensory language does not show up often in this novel, probably in accordance with the London tone. When describing a place frowning upon individuality and creativity, using imagery becomes ineffective. Huxley describes London as those living in London would describe it. He does so efficiently, commenting on productivity and ways to increase productivity."
ReplyDeleteI'm confused by your point. It seems like you say the imagery is both ineffective and effective?